Vaccines Today: The Controversy
I have for many years taught classes on this subject and have tried to educate the general public.
Like most people looking critically at vaccines, I have a list of things which seem to be definitely related to vaccines and then a list of things that I know are related, where I can explain the pathophysiology of what happens and have numerous real-life examples (of my own or practitioners I know personally and trust) of those situations.
I have a hard time discussing vaccines without some critical language.
I have firsthand knowledge of some of the cover up and dishonesty around them and some of my teachers have firsthand knowledge, so that I need not guess whether I am one of the "tin foil hat" crowd. I might be, but not on the subject of vaccines.
[By the way, some people are so sensitive to EM radiation that they are experiencing brain disturbances from it and may actually be relieved by wearing a aluminum-foil hat. Whether they are being directly influenced by EM radiation to their brain is uncertain, but we do know that your cell phone has the ability to monitor your brain waves and respond to them and train them. We cannot prove how this is being used, or if it is being used. I just have trouble believing we have that ability and no one is using it, considering the paragons of moral virtue who are in charge of the resources with that capability.]
A book would start out feigning neutrality and then gradually drop the bomb on you...
I will skip that part. It does not feel particularly honest.
The idea of vaccines is attractive. Take a shot, skip being sick! Hey, I like it!
I also like the idea of someone shuttling me around in a limousine, never having to work a day in my life, having regular massages, a harem, private jets I do not have to work for, my own private island...and I am just getting started!
I would love to stop right here. Let us be honest, that is the hidden, dirty, low-down, satanic, comunistic lie of vaccines.
I assume if you are reading my blog, you are mature enough to handle having a couple cold wake-up calls. Hopefully you long for them, knowing that if you get such a thing where you have a blind spot, you will gain SO much through the new power to improve your person, character and life. Hopefully, you are mature enough and awake enough that if I stopped right here, the message would have found its mark.
The entire proposal is NOT benevolent, even if it were harmless. And, like anything that is fundamentally against the light, it is NOT harmless.
The proposal is: Don't work for it. Do not go through the natural growth process. Do not learn along the way and become a grown up through going through the stages. Hijack the process! Steal the result! Skip the challenge! Mwahahaha!!!
Let me tell you what is really happening.
People want to eat trash, think trash, behave trash, have no discipline, have no one ever tell them they have to straighten up...they want to indulge themselves endlessly and have NO CONSEQUENCES! Wheeeeeee!
Sorry.
People are suckers for this kind of thing.
There is no life so difficult that it cannot be made worse by a little defiance, entitlement and being angry at anyone telling you to straighten up and do better!
Here is a reality check: none of the diseases we vaccinate against can exist in a healthy population doing healthy things. The power was in your hands all along.
Once, the availability of healthy food, raw, fresh produce, was, in some places, hard or impossible to get. Things could have been done, but they had neither the understanding or the immediate resources to fix the problem. They, I suppose, "had" to get sick.
But...
Today? We have the understanding of natural nutrition and natural medicine. You do not need to fear these illnesses, only your own ignorance (or apathy, if that is the real problem).
Eat 100% whole food (that means not modified chemically or genetically in any way beyond what can be done in your own kitchen with your own knowledge) and at least 51% raw food by weight (fruits and vegetables should make up 90% of this).
Consider reading Traci's book (email me and I will send you an electronic copy of her book and recipe book for free) and learn a little good understanding about how best to do it.
That will make you immune to most infectious diseases.
A little natural healing knowledge (which I provide most of here for free) will easily do the rest.
Here is the next point: Children NEED to get sick to develop healthy immune systems. Trying to cheat that just shows bad character and is foolhardy at best. The child WILL get SOMETHING. If you damage their immune system and inject toxic stuff into them, they will get some form or other of degenerative and chronic disease. They will have some level of maldevelopment. It is a certainty. It is not roulette. It is for sure. Barring divine intervention, they will be damaged.
In a minute, I will tell you why. Let me first finish this discussion.
Measles (which for more than 99.9%--maybe a lot more, that is one out of a thousand and it is probably more like 1 out of 10,000--of cases is just a rash for a few days after a fever for one or two days) gifts its recipients protection for life from cardiovascular disease, which is still the number one killer in the world.
Each disease (not just the ones we vaccinate against, but ALL of the infectious diseases) has a dark side and a light side. if you choose healthy choices, you will be given many gifts by the infectious diseases of childhood. You will be healthier mentally, physically and emotionally and will be more stable chemically because you got sick. You will detox better (and this can be augmented as discussed in several of my blog posts, including the how to do Enemas discussion).
It is no different than any other aspect of life. You put in the work--the earlier the better--and you become strong, responsible, competent. If you learn to respect the process of how things work, you also become wise and have the potential to become excellent in whatever area we are discussing.
Anciently, when mastery of a skill belonged to a family and the children followed after their parents as the application may be, the skill would develop over time, leading to GREAT masters of such skills as they had. While we can teach all skills today, real mastery comes from a lifetime of application and a lineage (whether by blood or not) that is passed down and honored and developed and then added to over a lifetime.
That is PRECISELY how the immune system works. We inheret parts of it and then we build on that based on what is given to our generation. If something new is encountered, there is a whole system in place for adapting to that and, if natural healing is understood, the new things are no threat.
There are several reasons that native American tribes may have died off from diseases given to them suddenly by the Europeans. The truth about how much this actually happened is not possible to obtain by any earthly means we now have among us. Even at the time it was happening, speculation outstripped actual data by many fold. Some Native American tribes were healthy, others were filthy, poorly fed (eating little if any fresh, raw food) and ill equipped for dealing with brand new stressors, which, if stressful enough, will suppress the immune system. How many actually died from diseases which were accidentally passed to the Natives, versus numbers poisoned intentionally by the Europeans, is unlikely to be found out anytime soon.
There are likely many reasons that no natural serious pandemic has happened in recent history and will not ever happen in the world again without a major change.
First, the human body makes little packets of information called exosomes, which are made in just a few minutes when a new pathogen is discovered and spread within an hour to everyone the person comes into contact with. This will go on for a while. How long is not known. But, then each person who gets the exosome will add any information they have and spread it for a while. Consequently, in the modern world, everyone in the world, almost, is prepped for a new pathogen, regardless of where it appears, in a couple of weeks. The spread of a new pathogen should be met with more communication and activity, not less. Travel should be increased, not stopped. I am sick, sick, sick of the fear and drama driven version of pathology, making the highly corrupt CDC some sort of God and making everyone feel excited like they are really helping out with something important if they shut down interaction with other humans because a new illness is about...
No. That would be entirely wrong and the product of a brain sick population. Drug companies love it though. They get to give you drugs and ridiculous disinfectant gimmicks right now, and they get to give you vaccines a little later, which, as I will show soon, will keep you sick for life. This, in turn, makes the drug companies trillions of dollars over the lifetime of a generation and they get a nice surge just before you die.
That, dear friends, is what you call a "conflict of interest!"
The second certain reason that no serious natural pandemic has or will occur without a major change in the world is that real surprises are pretty rare on a large scale. Maybe if aliens arrived and started killing off and torturing the population, that would do it. War on a large enough scale would do it. Total economic collapse would do it. Shutdown of transportation worldwide would do it. Global poisoning would do it.
It would have to be a situation so unexpected and so serious that we were unprepared to adapt to it. It would need to create a sense of helplessness in a vast portion of the population. Then, you could find either a naturally occurring or a genetically engineered pathogen that would actually kill a large portion of the population.
COVID had to be engineered because no natural conditions conducive to the development of such a bug exists today. In addition, they had to keep releasing new strains and they had to stop socialization (which is the NUMBER ONE activity that improves immune health and responsiveness). They had to stop travel because otherwise the exosomes would circle the globe before the "illness" got started. Even with all the efforts to stop the natural intelligence of the immune system in the human population, the actual COVID viruses barely killed anyone. The all-cause mortality only jumped for a couple weeks. Every death was ruled COVID in order to perpetuate the myth that it was dangerous. I was personally privy to this happening. Fear was sold nonstop by every media outlet with no real journalism investigating the fraud (proof for a sane person that the media is completely corrupted, if not corrupt). Alternative news media jumped on board in an effort to capitalize on some of that fear and drama.
Still, after all of that, most deaths due to COVID can be attributed to how they were cared for in the hospital, which was entierly wrong and totally senseless by all medical standards up to that time. Medical doctors who chose not to follow the prescribed (by the NIH, suddenly, without any journal articles or studies or any information whatsoever) protocols, were dismissed or their licenses were pulled summarily (an action illegal in every state). Still, all cause mortality did not rise!!!
Until the vaccine.
Then it went up.
At least 10 times as many people died from the vaccine as from COVID and its murderous treatments. Many numbers coming out suggest it is much higher, but I can only confirm 10 times as many.
Knowing that, you should know this: you CANNOT trust drug companies. And, really, what fool would do so? Most of them have been frequently indicted and frequently they have been found guilty of criminal behavior and had to pay fines... but fines a pittance compared to what they made from their fraud. Above all this we have the unavoidable problem of a conflict of interest in a collective group of immense power--more than enough to buy a few politicians needed to perpetuate whatever schemes they choose.
Of course, many honest and hard-working people work for drug companies and do their best. The same is true of the CDC and the WHO. This helps perpetuate the myth that they must be benevolent. But they are not.
Now, let us look at the problem with vaccines which cannot be dodged. You CAN keep producing conflicting studies (as has been happening nonstop since the recent information, studies and research has emerged showing vaccines were harming everyone who got them), but you cannot fix the basic problem, which is easy to explain.
It goes like this:
If I put foreign genetic material into your blood, so efficient is your immune system, that the foreign genetic material or protein will be destroyed in about 1/200th of a second. That is pretty fast!
In that scenario, there are no antibodies made. No immunity is gained. Nothing happens, basically. Even viruses only survive because they have a protective coating.
So...
Vaccines are made always by adding multiple variations of the genetic material (that would be why you find monkey kidney and aborted human fetal cells in the same vaccine) and they are always placed in adjuvants which are highly toxic and capable of disabling your immune system. This is absolutely necessary and without a serious shift in the whole strategy of vaccines, it must continue. They can change what is in there, but it still has to be toxic enough to disable your immune system or the genetic material will simply vanish with no long term effect.
Herein lies the currently unavoidable problem with vaccines, first and foremost. The toxic material and some of the genetic material will settle in tissue that is weak and easily overcome. This is a bad combination. Weak tissue will more easily get sick and now there is toxicity there that the immune system cannot remove and genetic material there that makes the immune system attack. This is how you get allergies, autoimmune disease and the ideal conditions for cancer. It is also how you get neurodevelopmenetal diseases like autism and learning disabilities, where the brain has been so stressed and damage continues endlessly, that abnormal development is the result.
This toxicity is typically never removed. This is why I say that EVERY person who gets vaccinated is damaged for life. There will always be dysfunction associated with whatever tissue the vaccine settles into, for the rest of the person's life.
What that looks like will depend on his or her health habits, how much developmental damage has been done and the variations of genetic health and the response the person reaches for when illness, acne, inflammation, arthritis, asthma, bowel or lung or heart dysfunction, etc. occurs.
A wise person will reach for natural remedies which augment the natural detoxification of the body and will feed their body raw, live food which provides for the needs of the immune system and elimination organs and frankly, builds healthy, high vibration tissue. They will have reliable supplements (Dr. Christopher, Standard Process, Herb Pharm, Richard Schulze) to restore the organ when it is sick.
In all probability, the relationship of vaccines to SIDS is probably the shock of the immune system when presented with a microbe that actually destroys the white blood cells that approach it. It may also be related to the toxic vaccine settling into key areas which affect respiration. Whatever happens, probably happens pretty quickly, which is why, many times, regression to autism happens beginning in the doctor's office (tens of thousands of these storiesexist, just from the United States).
Again, the toxicity of the vaccine is absolutely necessary with the current method of vaccinating. If one poison is removed, another must take its place. IT IS HOW THEY WORK!
2. The second serious problem with vaccines has existed at least since the first polio vaccine. There is evidence that it existed with the first compulsory vaccination act in Brittain which passed in 1853. Yes, that is 18...not 19. By 1889, at least two articles appeared in the London Journal of Medicine alleging that the vaccines were causing cancer, which had increased by 4 fold in those 36 years. In 1898 a conscience clause was introduced allowing parents to reject the vaccination (which was for smallpox) based on conscientious objection. Smallpox rates remained basically unchanged from 1847 (there had been a steady drop since 1838 until 1841--this is a regular occurrance before drug companies introduce a vaccine and claim they cured the condition) until 1871, when it spiked as high as measured in previous recent history. In 1874 it fell again to new lows and then gradually disappeared by 1900 (or very nearly).
Possibly, the technology of the 1860's and 1870's had some role in the disappearance of smallpox, where telephones, electric railway, light bulb, carbolic acid disinfection, septic tanks, systematic sewage disposal (passed in Brittain in 1866...mmmm, could that have had something to do with it...?), better chamber commodes (1872) which were more sanitary.
But in the case of the polio vaccine, it was discovered by a government hired researcher whose job it was to ensure safety of anything promoted by the government. She found over 40 live viruses contaminating the vaccine (which was supposed to be dead or otherwise attenuated). The 40th one gave cancer to every mammal into which it was injected. She told the government not to introduce the vaccine, and was given a gag order for her trouble.
Later in her life, when she exposed this cover up on public television, she signed her death warrant as within a month all her records were destroyed and she mysteriously died.
Strangely--or not--this contaminant virus is still known to be in vaccines.
Part of this is due to the fact that viruses are grown for vaccines in open rooms where other viruses are also grown which are known to jump through the air. Some percentage of all modern vaccines contain live viruses. Some of those are known to cause cancer in a high percentage of all mammals.
Animal vaccines are grown the same way, which probably explains why vaccinating your pet probably guarantees they will die of kidney failure or autoimmune disease or cancer, rather than natural causes.
Some estimates exist (and I cannot vouch for them because I do not have any way of checking their numbers) from 30 years ago, that for every case of polio syndrome (which happened only to about 1 in every 1000 polio cases--the rest just had flu-like symptoms and then were fine) which the vaccine supposedly prevented, it created some 20 cases of cancer. Some of those were childhood cancers. I am not okay with those numbers.
I say, "supposedly prevented" because a regular "bait and switch" is done by drug companies. When an infection is plummeting and then shows some stability at a much lower level, but while it is still actively in the public memory (sick people still around, wheelchair bound polio syndrome victims, etc), the drug company introduces a vaccine and then, even if (as in the case of polio) the infection numbers actually rise, they claim they are responsible for curing the disease. Then, they attack in one way or another, anyone who is heretical enough to question this new orthodoxy. Researchers no longer get papers published, doctors get fired or attacked in the news or other public forums, researchers no longer get funding, etc. Those who cooperate with the new, introduced dogma, are rewarded in all the ways the opponents are punished.
Only the flu vaccine has been used while the disease was still prevalent. The flu vaccine assessment varies so widely that one must conclude (as far as I can tell) that some numbers are simply made up. A recent study did show something that I and other natural healers had been observing for many years, however, which is this: after taking the flu shot for 3 years in a row, the vaccinated individuals get the flu (statistically, perhaps not every person) more often, and more severely, than before they started taking the flu vaccine. Ironically, the campaign seen in grocery stores and pharmacies everywhere, to "beat the flu," results in the flu beating you.
My own observation of a few individuals I knew well enough to notice and then the case histories of a few patients, was that after 5 years of getting the flu shot every year, most people got the flu 5 times as often and 5 times as bad as before they started taking the flu shot. Strangely, though many family members noticed it, the individuals themselves all continued to hurry in, hoping to beat the flu this year. All died of something other than old age. Make of that what you will.
3. The final point we will discuss here is a spot of immunology. This is more complicated, but I will see if I can simplify it.
In a natural setting, your immune system will first encounter exosomes from other people, preparing you for whatever infection is afloat. Within your body's health limitations, it will prepare for the infection. Then, at some point, the infection arrives and, if it is in high enough quantity and concentration, it will infect the body in a superficial way, such as mucus membranes. Here it is attacked by specialized white blood cells which will take what they learn and pass it on to your bloodstream where more preparations are made for the arrival of the pathogen. If the pathogen (virus or bacteria or fungus most commonly) survives this process, it will eventually get into your blood.
Once in your blood, it will be met by a generic form of antibodies which are selected because they are suited for a certain class of pathogen. Some generic antibodies exist for every possible pathogen that could exist on earth. These serve the purpose of binding to and gaining information about the pathogen in order to manufacture a specific antibody for it.
These weaker, generic antibodies are also part of the first line of real soldiers in the blood. Many of the pathogens are destroyed by this line of defense. In really healthy people, the entire infection will most probably be destroyed right here. In even weak cases, this line of defense slows down the infection to allow time for the manufacture of the very specific antibody made just for this infection.
The first line will also trigger the release of all manner of immune assisting chemicals, including cytokines which cause inflammation, contribute to fever, and cause pain (and which are responsible for many of the symptoms you get when you are "sick"--these cytokines will not reach levels high enough to make you feel sick at all if the first line of defense is unimpeded and can dispose of the infection right away, as it does in healthy people who are wise in their nutrition and thinking).
This whole process will start detoxification. This will go smoothly if the person is not too toxic. If they are highly toxic from bad diet and exposure to chemicals and other toxins (heavy metals, for example) then the elimination systems do not function well. The person then gets painful inflammation and excitation of elimination channels, causeing diarrhea, vomiting, painful urination or back pain, rashes or other skin eruptions, bad breath, coughing, runny nose, etc.
Once the specific, perfectly-formed antibodies are released, the battle is generally over. The infection, in a clean body, will be destroyed in a matter of minutes.
In a toxic body there are too many places to grow and hide. In a toxic body, you also have a mess that gets stirred up here or there and then you get raging inflammation to keep the immune system activated. This gives you PERSISTENT symptoms after the infection is actually killed off or well controlled. This state happens 1-2 days MAXIMUM after the start of symptoms. In this state (again, enter the lies of COVID) you are NOT contagious. You are most contagious the day before symptoms strike and the early part of the first day of symptoms.
The problem with this information is the modern day of genetically engineered viruses, which have multiple viruses' genetic material in them and which may cause a variety of symptoms and lead to a variety of viruses throughout the infection process.
Still, as a rule, it is pretty silly to quarantine someone on the second day of symptoms. That is when they will spread the most intelligent exosomes though, so there's that...
All that was a bit of wandering, but that leads to the THIRD thing I promised to tell you (all those paragraphs ago), which is this: when the SPECIFIC ANTIBODIES are made, the GENERIC, FIRST LINE ANTIBODIES are suppressed. This helps quiet down the inflammation and prevents wasted resources on generic, inefficient antibody production.
Here is why if you get multiple vaccines you are sure to get sicker. Vaccines TARGET ONLY SPECIFIC ANTIBODY PRODUCTION. The rest of the immune response IS SUPPRESSED by specific antibody production. The category of generic antibodies that matches that infection are suppressed specifically and intensively. If you get multiple shots for the same thing, the likelihood of severe infection from a mutated form of that pathogen (virus or bacteria, usually) or from a similar pathogen in the same family, goes up sharply! Every immunology textbook in the world contains this information. Doctors are just not being taught it well, and for obvious reasons.
Even one vaccination for a common pathogen may result in more serious infections because the body cannot fight off similar, but different versions.
Drug companies have hid this fact by making sure that hospitals (which need public health money to stay afloat) get the memo that their doctors (who need to work in the hospital to practice properly and for much of their income) need to follow specific diagnostic criteria, which includes DIAGNOSING VACCINATED KIDS WITH ALTERNATIVE DIAGNOSES AND UNVACCINATED KIDS WITH THE DIAGNOSIS OF A DISEASE WE VACCINATE AGAINST.
This is very common with measles, where a viral rash diagnosis is given to one kid and measles is given to another kid who came in at the same time with the same symptoms, but the second one was unvaccinated. This also happens with whooping cough, where one kid is diagnosed with RSV (a similar looking symptom pattern) and the other is diagnosed with pertussis (whooping cough) because they are not vaccinated. In this way, an illusion can be maintained that vaccines are working and unvaccinated kids are dangerous.
One final point on immunology: All immunology textbooks in the world agree that a human child before the age of 3 cannot sustain antibodies from vaccines. In that case, why take any risk whatsoever in that age group? There can only be one reason and that is to train the parents to keep doing what their doctor says. Of course, kids in that age range can certainly be injured...and can die of SIDS.
Numbers vary, but I have never seen a number below 60%...at least 60% of all SIDS cases happen within 72 hours of a vaccine and a well baby checkup. Thats a bummer statistic. I have seen numbers as high as 97% for SIDS happening within two weeks of a vaccine.